Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Nov 1996 05:30:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        freebsd-bugs
Subject:   Re: i386/2002: sio doesn't detect com port on Compaq Contura 430C
Message-ID:  <199611141330.FAA08823@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR i386/2002; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, housley@pr-comm.com
Cc:  Subject: Re: i386/2002: sio doesn't detect com port on Compaq Contura 430C
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 00:11:11 +1100

 >>Description:
 >
 >	sioprobe() does not fully find my com1 port.  There is PCMCIA on this
 >	laptop but that is disabled in the BIOS under security management.
 >	Com1 is at location 0x3F8 and IRQ 4.  DOS, Windows, OS/2 have all been
 >	able to find and use this port at it's current location.
 >
 >	sioprobe() seems to have trouble with verification of interrupts (I think).
 >	I added a printf statement to show the contents of the failures array.
 >	If I ignore #5 and #8 the result is overflows, even with nothing attached
 >	to the port.
 
 The sio behaviour might be caused by an IRQ 4 conflict with the
 incompletely disabled PCMCIA port.  I don't know why it only affects
 FreeBSD.  Perhaps probing sio1 or some other device causes problems.
 
 >	sio1: failures[0] = 252
 >	sio1: failures[1] = 253
 >	sio1: failures[2] = 247
 >	sio1: failures[3] = 1
 >	sio1: failures[4] = 13
 >	sio1: failures[5] = 0
 >	sio1: failures[6] = 14
 >	sio1: failures[7] = 255
 >	sio1: failures[8] = 0
 >	sio1: failures[9] = 14
 >	sio1 not found at 0x2f8
 
 These numbers show that nothing is there - each port has contents 0xff.
 
 Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611141330.FAA08823>