From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 19 14:50:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F6F37B400 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:50:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id 8B15B9B13; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:50:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:50:30 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: Will Andrews , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/36104: Patch for some XFree86-4 ports. Message-ID: <20020319225030.GN22998@squall.waterspout.com> Mail-Followup-To: Garance A Drosihn , Will Andrews , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200203191920.g2JJK5U87140@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:32:10PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > What happens in the newer worlds of FreeBSD/sparc64 & friends? > Don't they use a newer version of GCC for the system 'cc'? Good point. I hadn't considered that case. I guess it is worthwhile to add that patch anyway. No problem -- I'll do it. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message