Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:54:45 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Sean Cavanaugh <millenia2000@hotmail.com>
Cc:        chowse@charter.net, fbsd@bomgardner.net, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Old slow computers can still crank away (Formerly RE: Portsnap vs CSup)
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903201954030.79997@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY126-W4541FF3CB9D6F042F4A245CA970@phx.gbl>
References:  <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com> <49C29970.3070503@gmail.com> <B03C7532-C4E5-43F0-A877-7A88C5D5483C@charter.net> <20090319184847.J29356@tripel.monochrome.org> <20090319234359.M64636@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <BAY126-W143F3D1D4976B92944238BCA970@phx.gbl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903201647360.79600@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <BAY126-W4541FF3CB9D6F042F4A245CA970@phx.gbl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> > >
> > for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on
> > it works FAST on 100Mhz machine with 48MB RAM.
> >
> > Yes compiling is slow, but normal usage is FAST.
> 
> I never used gnome or KDE on it, ran Blackbox insted.
> 
of course it's fast.

and even slower machines like 486/33 without HD/FDD could be used as X 
terminals



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903201954030.79997>