From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 20 18:55:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A2E1065673 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858D18FC18 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2KIsqZo080002; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:54:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n2KIsjD7079999; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:54:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:54:45 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Sean Cavanaugh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com> <49C29970.3070503@gmail.com> <20090319184847.J29356@tripel.monochrome.org> <20090319234359.M64636@brightstar.bomgardner.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: chowse@charter.net, fbsd@bomgardner.net, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Old slow computers can still crank away (Formerly RE: Portsnap vs CSup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:55:16 -0000 > > > > > for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on > > it works FAST on 100Mhz machine with 48MB RAM. > > > > Yes compiling is slow, but normal usage is FAST. > > I never used gnome or KDE on it, ran Blackbox insted. > of course it's fast. and even slower machines like 486/33 without HD/FDD could be used as X terminals