Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:01:53 -0500
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org>
To:        Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ZFS read performance anomaly / performance regression
Message-ID:  <21220.31393.533799.991163@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CAJjvXiHnBq3bg-ZGgyzFw6WBNau0SmoLUfxWLtFCnBwb13fqaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <21219.21690.165105.561362@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <CAJjvXiHnBq3bg-ZGgyzFw6WBNau0SmoLUfxWLtFCnBwb13fqaQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 11:43:28 -0800, Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> said:

> How are you reading the files?  Could you be reading in less than
> block-size chunks (default 128K)?

Nope.  dd bs=1024k.

> This sounds similar to issue discussed in the thread with subject "ZFS slow
> reads for unallocated blocks", which was comparing sparse vs cached reads.
>  Since your storage is so fast, prefetch will probably read and cache the
> blocks by the time you issue the read() syscall, so you may be hitting a
> similar issue.

How would that have changed between 9.1 and 9.2?

-GAWollman




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21220.31393.533799.991163>