From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 25 07:33:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2BC16A41F for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 07:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jshevland@rowantreesoftware.com.au) Received: from www.rowantreesoftware.com.au (218-214-142-195.people.net.au [218.214.142.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC4043D46 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 07:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jshevland@rowantreesoftware.com.au) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [10.10.0.250]) by www.rowantreesoftware.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5BC11415 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 18:36:01 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <44755DAD.50204@rowantreesoftware.com.au> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:33:01 +1000 From: Joe Shevland Organization: Rowantree Software Pty. Ltd. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: nss_ldap and OpenLDAP client version X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:33:56 -0000 Hi, I'm about to setup my jails so they authenticate against the 'host' server using OpenLDAP and nss_ldap, pam_ldap and so on. I've done this before but wanted to repeat the process because last time it ended up being so much fiddling that when I finished I just left it alone - this time I'm documenting it :) I packaged up versions of the port for OpenLDAP 2.3 (well, actually 2.4 but that looks to just use 2.3 in any case) and then went to package up the nss_ldap port but its after OpenLDAP 2.2 stuff... I guess my question is whether this is intentional (i.e. security related), or just a port maintenance issue? I would've thought between 2.2->2.3 there's been a few security advisories... I only did a lazy lightning google and came across a few (http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2005/0947) is perhaps one. Anyway, just thought I'd check. As punishment, if this is a stupid question or has been answered before, happy to write up a tutorial as I go as penance. Cheers Joe