Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:37:18 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kopete 7.3 Message-ID: <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> References: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--H8ygTp4AXg6deix2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:17PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I been > > doing it wrong? > > >=20 > No, I also use make index because historically there were significantly= =20 > fewer error messages. I think someone almost got hysterical from=20 > surprise a short time ago when portsdb -U completed with out a single=20 > message.=20 >=20 > My attitude is that if Kris' script ran portsdb -U, then I would use it= =20 > everytime I cvsup ports-all instead of using make index. AFAIK portsdb -U just calls 'make index' internally. The difference would then presumably be caused by the make environment: my index build tests simulate a clean environment by defining LOCALBASE, X11BASE, etc. Kris --H8ygTp4AXg6deix2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFtoNWry0BWjoQKURAnCeAJoDvtCMDVyGyjxGbXzNU9kEwk2/iQCfXcmV ZMDZNvlO+bZR66itg2huPfc= =bf3z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H8ygTp4AXg6deix2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040127213718.GC68505>