Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:50:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181749160.78762@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <op.wf3upvdc34t2sn@tech304> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <4FCF9C07.2000607@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161815550.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <op.wf0i64pg34t2sn@me-pc> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206172212440.2506@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <op.wf3upvdc34t2sn@tech304>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Are you sure CLANG is the bloated project? already posted comparision. your seems like too much propaganda. I don't say clang is just bad, but i prefer real data over hype.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181749160.78762>