Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:54:51 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: "Andrew Falanga" <af300wsm@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: samba and IPv6 Message-ID: <44abv22tx0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706141239xa30c41fnff8b2bb1f31a9489@mail.gmail.com> (Andrew Falanga's message of "Thu\, 14 Jun 2007 13\:39\:29 -0600") References: <340a29540706141117o3584f1adid95e240fcbabcd72@mail.gmail.com> <44645q74hd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <340a29540706141239xa30c41fnff8b2bb1f31a9489@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrew Falanga" <af300wsm@gmail.com> writes: > On 6/14/07, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: >> "Andrew Falanga" <af300wsm@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information >> > from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link >> > in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6. >> >> There's a link on the Samba front page from last week. >> The short version is that it doesn't do it yet, and probably won't >> until Samba 4 (which has other changes for interoperating with >> Vista -- which is the first Windows to really do IPv6 well). >> There are patch sets around if you're willing to get your hands >> a bit dirty. > > Nope, don't mind getting my hands dirty (I do most of the work on my > automobiles too). However, I take it from this that because I must > get my hands dirty, none of these patches are in the ports system? I As far as I can see, they are not. > ask because I noticed as I installed vim last night that many patches > were downloaded along with the main vim tar-ball. You could talk to the maintainer about that. Samba4 probably isn't ready to be added to the ports system anyway, but patches against Samba3 seem to exist also.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44abv22tx0.fsf>