Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:10:36 -0500
From:      Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
To:        Subbsd <subbsd@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: why vim ports have personal KNOBS for options
Message-ID:  <AANLkTiks4K=y5mcstzwuO0x4==8pHgJ84Ofyh8NJRUBS@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik-401k6N94upmS2WrxNtERsP0puA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <BANLkTinymz5kjuysy1dFqoOkhTmUqHVheg@mail.gmail.com> <20110327184837.GA36228@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <BANLkTik-401k6N94upmS2WrxNtERsP0puA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I expected to hear that just so happened historically. =D0=A2ext question=
 I
> ask only to satisfy my interest. What OPTIONS framework basically can
> someone not like it?

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-October/063914.html



--=20
Eitan Adler



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTiks4K=y5mcstzwuO0x4==8pHgJ84Ofyh8NJRUBS>