Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:10:36 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Subbsd <subbsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why vim ports have personal KNOBS for options Message-ID: <AANLkTiks4K=y5mcstzwuO0x4==8pHgJ84Ofyh8NJRUBS@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik-401k6N94upmS2WrxNtERsP0puA@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTinymz5kjuysy1dFqoOkhTmUqHVheg@mail.gmail.com> <20110327184837.GA36228@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <BANLkTik-401k6N94upmS2WrxNtERsP0puA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I expected to hear that just so happened historically. =D0=A2ext question= I > ask only to satisfy my interest. What OPTIONS framework basically can > someone not like it? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-October/063914.html --=20 Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTiks4K=y5mcstzwuO0x4==8pHgJ84Ofyh8NJRUBS>