From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 23:30:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D363E16A41F for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20F8143D46 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:30:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 5991 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 23:30:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2UZXvmaignV0grnUF9gDFKNC/S+EaeevK38RzPd2DaE7c+fqimbnDcfjVg0YWXE+wl9wWL23aJ8lR54aicpinwUx4WfEuwzFxSbZlYv+8rugqeeJkUws495e5QVN6nPP/jdaYYm1jD+KqsrAlvn90T0XRaMyK/N+nhyFcLl0tzo= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.150?) (mjeays2551@24.114.152.139 with plain) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 23:30:11 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Norbert Koch In-Reply-To: <000001c592a1$ef621660$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> References: <000001c592a1$ef621660$4801a8c0@ws-ew-3.W2KDEMIG> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1122507010.1281.7.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:30:10 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, demigor Subject: RE: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:30:16 -0000 On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 07:54, Norbert Koch wrote: > > How one could defragment a partition on FreeBSD ? Which tools are > > available > > for this ? > > None as I know. Usually there is no reason to defragment a ufs partition. > > Norbert > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" This is one of the things I find really hard to get Windows users to understand. They just won't believe that a company like Microsoft would still be using a filesystem that needs defragmenting if it were possible to design one that didn't. I often wonder why myself - after all, they must have put a fair amount of work into NTFS, which at least doesn't seem to get corrupted in a power failure. Did they make a trade-off I don't understand, or is it just incompetence - or worse, a deal with disk manufacturers to sell more disk?