From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 10:34:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88C916A41F; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:34:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snezhko@indorsoft.ru) Received: from indor.net.tomline.ru (indor.net.tomline.ru [213.183.100.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7243B43D45; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:34:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snezhko@indorsoft.ru) Received: from SNEZHKO by indorsoft.ru (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.2.R) with ESMTP id md50000043618.msg; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:34:02 +0600 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.32b, engine: 4.32b, virus records: 132805, updated: 29.12.2005] To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <20060110095926.GE87430@FreeBSD.org> From: Victor Snezhko Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:34:00 +0600 In-Reply-To: <20060110095926.GE87430@FreeBSD.org> (Gleb Smirnoff's message of "Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:59:26 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Processed: indor.net.tomline.ru, Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:34:02 +0600 (not processed: spam filter disabled) X-Return-Path: snezhko@indorsoft.ru X-VVS-Spam: false Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Goran Gajic Subject: Re: 7.0-CURRENT ppp related panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:34:09 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff writes: > G> I have managed to trigger two panics by doing ifconfig ppp0 destroy while > G> ppp was running. > > Kernel ppp(4) is known to have problems. At least there are problems with > interaction of Giant-locked tty layer and Giant-less network layer. > > I'd recommend you to use user-level ppp(8), or mpd, which routes traffic > through kernel ng_ppp(4). I may be mistaken, but I saw pppd in the panic report, isn't it an indication of user-level ppp? P.S.: I'm using user-level ppp(it comes before kernel one in the handbook :)) and I am lucky enough not to experience any problem since I switched to -current in November (besides INET6-caused one, which is now fixed). Thanks for notice, though. -- WBR, Victor V. Snezhko EMail: snezhko@indorsoft.ru