Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:10:30 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/awk Makefile Message-ID: <20020410161030.D80542@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020410183035.GL98684@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:30:35PM %2B0300 References: <200204100310.g3A3A3n32628@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020410183035.GL98684@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:30:35PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Modified files: > > usr.bin/awk Makefile > > Log: > > Style. > Putting ln(1) arguments in non-alphabetical order doesn't enhance > style. There are more instances if -sf than -fs. > The first PROG= line in <bsd.prog.mk> driven makefiles gives the > basic indent (usually one tab). Oh it does? Maybe in 40% of our Makefiles. _We_have_no_Makefile_style_ The only consistancy we have is when I got sick of sys/modules and usr.sbin. > Lvalues in assignment lines that > exceed this basic indent should use a single space after an > operator. Where is that shown? I made this Makefile in this reguard the way I have made all the Makefiles I have [re]written. > Please back this change out. No thank you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020410161030.D80542>