Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:14:20 +1000
From:      Fraser Tweedale <frase@frase.id.au>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why not GNU cmp?
Message-ID:  <20080926041419.GA56030@bacardi.frase.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <FF8482A96323694490C194BABEAC24A0034D34CD@Email.cbord.com>
References:  <20080925084825.GA2728@kokopelli.hydra> <FF8482A96323694490C194BABEAC24A0034D34CD@Email.cbord.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 08:41:23AM -0400, Bob McConnell wrote:
> On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
> >On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 08:34:50AM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> Unga wrote:
> >>=20
> >> >I was wondering why FreeBSD wrote their own version of cmp. If it
> just the=20
> >> >license, then that's fine. I prefer the BSD versions of diff, etc.
> when=20
> >> >available.=20
> >>=20
> >> You are asking the wrong questions: why did GNU write their own
> version=20
> >> of cmp?  FreeBSD's dates to 1987.
> >=20
> > Y'know -- that's a really good question.
>=20
> The answer is simple. The BSD license does not guarantee freedom as
> defined by RMS.
>=20
>  * The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
>  * The freedom to study how the program works and adapt it to
>    your needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition.
>  * The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor
>    (freedom 2).
>  * The freedom to improve the program and release your improvements
>    to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3).
>    Access to the source code is a precondition.
>=20
> For example, Microsoft uses many of the TCP applications and drivers
> from BSD, but will not allow access to their source code as required by
> freedoms 1 and 3.
>=20
> Bob McConnell
>

The BSD license -is- a free software license as defined by the FSF.
It is not copyleft like the GPL, but it is satisfies the four essential
freedoms.  RMS agrees.

frase

--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjcYZsACgkQPw/2FZbemTXrjgCeOgtve7+xC9DHwjU/HriocrFI
0WsAn2EvwTRsn+z6n9JRWXkn4x+0gQQQ
=Ug6I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080926041419.GA56030>