From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 30 10:16:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA19283 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 10:16:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fly.HiWAAY.net (dkelly@fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA19240 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 10:16:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@fly.HiWAAY.net) Received: (from dkelly@localhost) by fly.HiWAAY.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id MAA15981; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:16:00 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:16:00 -0600 (CST) From: David Kelly Message-Id: <199801301816.MAA15981@fly.HiWAAY.net> To: astrand@linum.cofc.edu, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: emulation of NetBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe questions" Allan Strand writes: > > I've looked at the archives and never really found a satifying answer > to this question: Can NetBSD 1.2 binaries be run on FreeBSD (2.2.5). > Right now on my statically linked NetBSD binaries I get a "bad magic > number" error. I've got some binaries that I don't have ready access > to source for. I'd like to contiunue to use them in a FreeBSD > environment if possible. Me too. But the binaries are dynamically linked and the complaint is about ld.so. What to do? -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net (hm) ====================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.