Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:47:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: multimedia@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251125] audio/jack: update to jack2 or add new port audio/jack2 Message-ID: <bug-251125-12827-HloO0qtoRv@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251125-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251125-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251125 Goran Meki=C4=87 <meka@tilda.center> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #220400|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #74 from Goran Meki=C4=87 <meka@tilda.center> --- Created attachment 220514 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D220514&action= =3Dedit jack.diff Improvements suggested by diizzy @ efnet. So just to be explicit, the reason why fork is used to build the port/package is that we intend to upstream changes once more people are exposed to the new jack. Those patches can be applied to development branch of upstream, and once we're satisfied with ho= w it works, send pull request. The changes are minimal as OSS support was mostly present, except it was only build on Solaris, so some glue and patching was needed. Also, 3-byte 24bit support (packed format) and non-power-of-2 numbe= r of channels are added through these patches. The reason the celt is disabled is because the upstream is dead.=20 QA: * portlint: OK (looks fine.) * testport: OK (poudriere: 12.2, amd64 tested) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251125-12827-HloO0qtoRv>