Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:23:21 +1100
From:      "Andrew Snow" <>
To:        <>
Subject:   RE: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

What would be better is firstly the ability to delete a range of rule
numbers, but better than that would be support for 'rule groups', where you
could bunch a number of rules together under the same group name or number
and manipulate them seperately.

- Andrew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Patrick O'Reilly
> Sent: Thursday, 22 March 2001 6:20 PM
> To: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c
> Gents,
> If I may throw in my 2c worth - from the point of view of a user (I'd love
> to be a contributor, but will need to learn some C first ;-) I think the
> idea of being able to 'pin' some rules to survive a flush is
> excellent.  The
> default rule (# 65535) behaves somewhat like that already.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>