From owner-freebsd-ipfw Wed Mar 21 23:23:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from esper.modulus.org (esper.modulus.org [202.181.1.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A400237B71F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:23:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@modulus.org) Received: from Avon (avon.modulus.org [202.181.1.250]) by esper.modulus.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B243B1B0 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:23:19 +1100 (EST) From: "Andrew Snow" To: Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:23:21 +1100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What would be better is firstly the ability to delete a range of rule numbers, but better than that would be support for 'rule groups', where you could bunch a number of rules together under the same group name or number and manipulate them seperately. - Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Patrick O'Reilly > Sent: Thursday, 22 March 2001 6:20 PM > To: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c > > > Gents, > > If I may throw in my 2c worth - from the point of view of a user (I'd love > to be a contributor, but will need to learn some C first ;-) I think the > idea of being able to 'pin' some rules to survive a flush is > excellent. The > default rule (# 65535) behaves somewhat like that already. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message