Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:59:45 -0700
From:      Ngie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com>
Cc:        "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r316591 - head/sys/dev/tpm
Message-ID:  <39DE48A2-9526-497E-B178-CE78B2EF4020@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGMYy3uDMcTQw_MqquXGxfPWcWFF9FikTA4LWwK4jmsvgjza1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201704062221.v36MLnr7092648@repo.freebsd.org> <F4902DBF-9E62-4ED0-8960-851E43F4F745@gmail.com> <CAGMYy3uDMcTQw_MqquXGxfPWcWFF9FikTA4LWwK4jmsvgjza1Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Apr 7, 2017, at 10:17, Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> No, David's change was correct.
>=20
> The code context is something like:
>=20
> #ifdef __FreeBSD__
> [...]
> #else /* OpenBSD */
> ...
> #ifdef __FreeBSD__ /* -- this portion got removed -- */
> ...
> #else
> ...
> #endif
> [...]
> #endif

So, in short David enabled suspend/resume support in tpm(4)... (it looks lik=
e it was disabled before, just based on the variable names/calls)? Why wasn'=
t that clearly stated in the commit?
Thanks,
-Ngie=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39DE48A2-9526-497E-B178-CE78B2EF4020>