Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:01:43 -0300 From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>, Ivo Vachkov <ivo.vachkov@gmail.com>, bz@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposed patch for Port Randomization modifications according to RFC6056 Message-ID: <4D6ABBB7.9060807@gont.com.ar> In-Reply-To: <4D6AB636.3030708@FreeBSD.org> References: <AANLkTi=rF%2BCYiNG7PurPtrwn-AMT9cYEe90epGAJDwDq@mail.gmail.com> <4D411CC6.1090202@gont.com.ar> <AANLkTinvg5tft8xockuuV9g5QYd36ko9qO4YCvy5bkJ1@mail.gmail.com> <4D431258.8040704@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTimhZ_pxTGt958AX8m=%2BS=g2hqsst=GH1a99D0g1@mail.gmail.com> <4D437B13.1070405@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTim4=xa0rfoLgt-ao30XoZkLZ1hMYzE6LsrLNcbM@mail.gmail.com> <4D518FB3.3040503@FreeBSD.org> <4D6AB2BD.50208@gont.com.ar> <4D6AB636.3030708@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27/02/2011 05:38 p.m., Doug Barton wrote: >> Has this been commited to the tree, already? -- If so, what's the >> default algorithm? > > Bjoern was planning to do it, I'm going to do it if he doesn't get > around to it. > > As for default algorithm, is there any reason not to make it 4? Not at all. Algorithm 4 (double-hash) is the best option, IMO. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D6ABBB7.9060807>