From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 16 22: 1:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE15737B405; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 22:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA12416; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:01:37 +1000 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:06:18 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Terry Lambert Cc: Maxime Henrion , Subject: Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build In-Reply-To: <3D0C78F0.FDD244F9@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20020617150426.W3371-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > > It's routine to assume that I'm going to use libc?!? > > > > No. It is routine to assume that users use a library that meets the > > compiler's requirements (the compiler gets to decide, not the users; > > it is only constrained by the relevant standards and historical > > (mal)practice). > > Where is this crap, and how to turn it off, spelled out, other > than the source code? I didn't see it in the .info; maybe I'm > just looking in the wrong place? Restrictions on C compilers are specified in C standards. The standards mostly try to not restrict the compiler. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message