From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 14 15:36:29 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D7F16A408;
	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:36:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from msgs_for_me@mail.ru)
Received: from mx33.mail.ru (mx33.mail.ru [194.67.23.194])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D9013C48D;
	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:36:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from msgs_for_me@mail.ru)
Received: from [80.244.229.35] (port=7229 helo=VLADIMIR)
	by mx33.mail.ru with asmtp 
	id 1HHMBG-000DLd-00; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:36:27 +0300
X-Nat-Received: from [192.168.1.110]:3843 [ident-empty]
	by smtp-proxy.vltele.com with TPROXY id 1171467214.12688
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:36:25 +0300
From: Vladimir Kapustin <msgs_for_me@mail.ru>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.85.03) Professional
Organization: vltele.com
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1024498861.20070214183625@mail.ru>
To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: How to optimize ruleset for gateway?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Vladimir Kapustin <msgs_for_me@mail.ru>
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:36:29 -0000

Hi, all!

I have such a problem when configuring the gateway for my LAN:

I want to minimize the number of rules, and for this purpose I chose PF,
but, as I wrote earlyer: 
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2007-January/002958.html
and found some mails of other people:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2006-October/002681.html
if I want to configure connection speed for each user on PF, I must
configure the number of queues equal to the number of users, i.e. if I
configure one queue and allow the table of users go to the Internet through
this queue, I see, that all of them share the bandwidth of this queue.

I don't think this is a good idea, and now I choosing some other
variants of optimization, such as:

1. Configure PF for major rules and SPAM filtering and IPFW+DUMMYNET for
queueing. I've read somewhere, that IPFW-shaper supports tables the way I
need. I'm afraid that two firewalls should significantly decrease perfomance.

2. Configure only IPFW. But this means that I have to read full documentation
about it, and find the way to protect the Internet from SPAM going from my 
local NET.

The ruleset looks like:
0. Binat for real IP.
1. Block NetBIOS
2. Pass all from table-1
3. Pass all from table-128kbps queue 1(128kbps)
4. .....................
5. Pass all from table-1024kbps queue 4(1024kbps)
6. Some spam-protection tool (like spamd)
7. Block all

Could somebody give me some advice what way to go?

P.S. Now my gateway works on 2-processor Xeon router with Redhat and iptables.
It has 100 Mbps Internet channel, and in the time of maximum charge it
processes 10-20 kpps.