Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:50:54 -0800 From: xSAPPYx <xsappyx@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: alex <alex@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD's UFS vs Ext4 Message-ID: <8206ae961002111750k55e33a0cu29bad4ee775a83bb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <d36406631002100827g71e1db1fxab6416876347f8c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B6ED119.2060308@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> <20100207172150.GA59080@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <4B6F4631.6050501@mailinglist.ahhyes.net> <20100208150000.GA62607@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <20100208195807.GC8690@guilt.hydra> <87hbpqz8wp.fsf@kobe.laptop> <d36406631002100827g71e1db1fxab6416876347f8c3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Using a phoronix link as an example, ext4 still has some pretty bad data loss bugs: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Nzk0OA imo: data security of ufs > speed of ext4 ymmv
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8206ae961002111750k55e33a0cu29bad4ee775a83bb>