Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:33:18 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2 Message-ID: <4B8DD87E.2050207@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201003030044.o230iGLF058596@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201003030044.o230iGLF058596@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/2/2010 4:44 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Pursuing diffs on re-rolled sources might be nice, but Doug, after > you also refused to allow ports to flag installs of binaries not > built from fetched sources ? ... Balance seems missing ! I didn't "refuse" anything, I have no actual authority. :) I'm just a lowly committer. What I _did_ say was that I agreed with the policy that ports should be built from a stable set of sources, and I voiced my opposition to the idea of changing that policy. My concern about the changes to the sources of this port is along the same lines. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B8DD87E.2050207>