Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:35:13 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org CURRENT" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>, FreeBSD Current <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: GCC withdraw Message-ID: <ADADF693-B140-4C87-B464-9F139B31E7B5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <52204746.2070900@freebsd.org> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <CAOFF%2BZ3vbOgMO7T-BKZnhKte6=rFoGcdYcft5kpAgNH2my1JKg@mail.gmail.com> <DC41B4BD-159A-408B-804A-0230F3E0E52B@FreeBSD.org> <201308291057.43027.jhb@freebsd.org> <8F836479-BC3A-4679-A7AA-3BCDD34AE6C5@FreeBSD.org> <52204746.2070900@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 Aug 2013, at 08:18, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > As far as I'm concerned we can even slate it for > "possible removal in 10.2-- if clang has proven up to the task" I would be happy to ship gcc, as long as: - It's explicitly marked as deprecated and due for removal at some point = in the 10.x timeframe. - libstdc++ is gone (the amount of pain it's causing ports is = phenomenal). David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ADADF693-B140-4C87-B464-9F139B31E7B5>