From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Nov 27 03:31:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DE61137BA7 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from admin.sibptus.ru (admin.sibptus.ru [IPv6:2001:19f0:5001:21dc::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB757F905 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sibptus.ru; s=20181118; h=In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=YiNSCEHCig0Re8O53S8MGObtGf+N2IAqOM+QgNT/k/Y=; b=Yx4x88nlc+RPNUYRLVttYN8WY7 rG3PTkBhbwn6LbbSetM85gV63f1kbB+4xa7TpSDBUtbZEeDdAitKIlOdiLjuvoPgMn7eok3ZoilX4 6eO6RKdfHD6KL/vs1aPejGqr0KqNY1t+81nPDjO5iUmQA41R1n8lMwOa1fTgAJ/p+m3U=; Received: from vas by admin.sibptus.ru with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1gRU5m-000ODA-6d; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:31:18 +0700 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:31:18 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: "John R. Levine" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, rwmaillists@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Invalid DKIM signatures in this list Message-ID: <20181127033118.GA86646@admin.sibptus.ru> References: <20181126185830.18005da3@gumby.homeunix.com> <20181126232835.4593A2008E8EE1@ary.qy> <20181127023143.GD79319@admin.sibptus.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: Victor Sudakov X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4EB757F905 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[sibptus.ru]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tomsk.su]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[sibptus.ru:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: admin.sibptus.ru]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.943,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.37)[ip: (-7.97), ipnet: 2001:19f0:5000::/38(-3.98), asn: 20473(0.19), country: US(-0.09)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:5000::/38, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:31:21 -0000 John R. Levine wrote: >> The problem is: The signature was not broken until FreeBSD's list manager >> touched the body. > >Yes, we all know that. We knew that a decade ago when we wrote the DKIM >specs. That is not news. Do you mean nobody cares? RFC6377 is dated September 2011, for all these years nobody has tried to do something about FreeBSD's MLM breaking signatures? OK, fine. > >> PS I recommend RFC6377 for reading. I learnt much from it. > >Indeed, but I wouldn't take everything it says too seriously. But a fix to the MLM should be pretty trivial too? For the present, it's annoying to see ugly "red padlocks" near some messages in the MUA. Even no padlock at all would look better. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/