Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:06:04 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, George Sanders <gosand1982@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Improving old-fashioned UFS2 performance with lots of inodes... Message-ID: <CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca%2Bxvay73EeYen%2Buw2Ng@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan> References: <1309217450.43651.YahooMailRC@web120014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 June 2011 02:08, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> wrote: > > On what exact OS version? =A0Please don't say "8.2", need to know > 8.2-RELEASE, -STABLE, or what. =A0You said "8.x" above, which is too > vague. =A0If 8.2-STABLE you should not be tuning vm.kmem_size_max at all, > and you probably don't need to tune vm.kmem_size either. We don't do 8.2-STABLE, it's 8-STABLE.... Are you referring to the difference between RELENG_8_2 and RELENG_8_2_0_RELEASE? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca%2Bxvay73EeYen%2Buw2Ng>