From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 9 22:52:48 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA15069 for current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 22:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA15030 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 22:52:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id HAA02025; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 07:52:27 +0100 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id HAA27228; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 07:52:26 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.3/8.6.9) id HAA05307; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 07:49:07 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199601100649.HAA05307@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: make world To: uh@sed.cs.fsu.edu (Gang-Ryung Uh) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 07:49:07 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199601100403.XAA10376@sed.cs.fsu.edu> from "Gang-Ryung Uh" at Jan 9, 96 11:03:34 pm X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Gang-Ryung Uh wrote: > > I am trying to build the FreeBSD-current (which I downloaded 7 days ago). > But in the early stage of "make world", I got an following fatal error: > ===> rtld > install -c -s -o bin -g bin -m 555 -fschg ld.so /usr/libexec > install -c -o bin -g bin -m 444 rtld.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 > Memory fault > *** Error code 139 > I am just curious in what situation the "Memory fault" message > can be generated. Would you tell me how to fix that problem? This seems to be the same problem i'm experiencing when trying to ``make release'', except i'm only getting it in the chroot'ed tree, with the make binary running from there. At least for me, it's `make' that segfaults here. And it does _not_ appear to be kernel- related! Has anybody been changing something in the area of malloc()? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)