From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 16:29:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63398106566B for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sub.mesa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A27D8FC0C for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbg20 with SMTP id g20so2011904ghb.13 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:29:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uNIwdkJpzICixgx9HluSaw/HopIZuf5mHNsI05oKSHU=; b=tldBepb1KfZJPrdrozZ0X/ZJzjkVqNrGrhDrC1ncpRhUQxVPDXhroGnlR++jS3x+Gm W465pif2TacTXZeAEkfiaNDfgkHcNjXMn5Hw0YVqXNU/riI7jA4T3IY/wDPy4xWuIthc XEf70kJ5pHihkrlhyPGnGCzmMQczCtjS1aCBo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.121.10 with SMTP id t10mr1764606anc.129.1321720149382; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.79.233 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:29:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:29:09 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jason Edwards To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:29:10 -0000 Dear list, Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: 1) the cursor starts on line 2 instead of line 1 2) the line numbering is printed on line 1 instead of the boundary (line 0) 3) the keys page up and page down bring the escape menu Strange enough, if I SSH into the box the ee editor works normally. So I'm wondering if this is something other people have noticed? Just want to exclude the possibility of me doing something wrong. I've noticed this behavior on 9-CURRENT, 9.0-RC1 as well as 9.0-RC2, amd64. GENERIC kernel and tested inside Virtualbox. Regards, Jason