Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:49:29 -0800 From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> To: <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>, <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: NAT (ipfw/natd) broken in latest -CURRENT Message-ID: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4302B1CABD@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> In-Reply-To: <slrnglk4g5.23vr.vadim_nuclight@server.filona.x88.info> References: <1229476796.49670.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com><B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4302A26B5F@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com><1229637745.60337.62.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com><B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4302A26E8C@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com><slrnglhjsg.1ln5.vadim_nuclight@server.filona.x88.info><B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A431442F6@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <slrnglk4g5.23vr.vadim_nuclight@server.filona.x88.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>=20 > The problem is, many NAT-PMP utilizing programs (e.g. p2p-clients) > according > to protocol specs do lookup of default gateway's IP address. FreeBSD > ppp implementations tend to include correct address of gateway, so > lookup works, while some other ppp implementations specify something > other, e.g. inetrface route, self address... Will this change break > those > progs on FreeBSD too? >=20 AFAIK these programs should continue to function but let me know if you think something is broken. -- Qing
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4302B1CABD>