From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Jul 23 18:20:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from ptldpop2.ptld.uswest.net (ptldpop2.ptld.uswest.net [198.36.160.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43F7B14F1E for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 18:20:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from summoner@uswest.net) Received: (qmail 3868 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 1999 01:20:22 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org@fixme Received: (qmail 3858 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jul 1999 01:20:22 -0000 Received: from edsl209.ptld.uswest.net (HELO uswest.net) (209.180.175.209) by ptldpop2.ptld.uswest.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 1999 01:20:22 -0000 Message-ID: <379914D5.6DB65A6C@uswest.net> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 18:20:21 -0700 From: Summoner X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Armstrong Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What to tell to Linux-centric people?! References: <37991278.5324A70B@uswest.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Armstrong wrote: > Moral of the story, if something goes wrong with your root login > shell your in a little trouble and much less is likely to happen to > sh then to tcsh or bash or any other port shell. Why would sh be less likely to get screwed up? Because it's hardly ever used? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message