From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Aug 12 23:21:09 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id XAA12670
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 12 Aug 1995 23:21:09 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA12663
          ; Sat, 12 Aug 1995 23:21:07 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA05402; Sat, 12 Aug 1995 23:21:02 -0700
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 1995 23:21:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199508130621.XAA05402@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: julian@TFS.COM
CC: ports@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org, davidg@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <m0shU5I-0003wPC@TFS.COM> (julian@TFS.COM)
Subject: Re: ok I found the answer..
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * the current ports can't be used with the latest snapshot because 
 * ldconfig has grown a new argument.. (-m)

That's right...I thought Jordan pulled it into the 2.1 tree a long
time ago but that was wrong....

I'm now pestering Jordan and DavidG to get it into the 2.1 tree.  I'm
going to veto another snap going out without it.... :)

Satoshi