From owner-freebsd-net Mon Mar 22 0: 7:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from main.piter.net (main.piter.net [195.201.22.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C466F14CEC; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:07:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cyril@main.piter.net) Received: (from cyril@localhost) by main.piter.net (8.8.7/8.8.7/sply) id LAA06347; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:07:20 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from cyril) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:07:20 +0300 (MSK) From: "Cyril A. Vechera" Message-Id: <199903220807.LAA06347@main.piter.net> To: gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@whistle.com Subject: Re: clustering/load balancing Cc: cmsedore@maxwell.syr.edu, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 07:28:07 1999 > To: Julian Elischer > Cc: Christopher Sedore , > "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" > From: "Gary Palmer" > Subject: Re: clustering/load balancing > Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 23:27:43 -0500 > > Julian Elischer wrote in message ID > <36F1BA88.2F1CF0FB@whistle.com>: > > +-------[Machine B] > > | > > [internet]-----[ Machine A ]-----+-------[Machine C] > > | > > +-------[Machine D] > > ^^^^^^^^^ > > Single Point Of Failure in the original scheme 'single point of failure' is still present. +-------[Machine B] | [internet]-----[ any router ]----+-------[Machine C] | +-------[Machine D] ^^^^^^^^^ or maybe you can see other way to connect 'internet' to Machine [B-C]? what is the differense between 'any router' failures and 'balance dispatcher' failures? Sincerely your, Cyril A. Vechera email:cyril@piter.net --------- http://sply.piter.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message