From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 21:52:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD6A1065679; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4298FC12; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <484EF781.7000003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:52:01 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Kozlov References: <20080610202619.GA94066@ravenloft.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20080610202619.GA94066@ravenloft.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, cperciva@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build optimizations - please review X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:52:02 -0000 Alex Kozlov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX >> builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am >> particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes >> built locally: the only diff should be in audio/festvox-hvs [1]. > Work on RELENG_6 only after this patch (maybe good candidate for MFC): Crap! I need :u! Without it the duplicate removal will have to be pushed into the perl script that collates the output, which means that Colin's portsnap script may be affected. The patch definitely should be MFCed though. Who committed it originally to HEAD? Kris