From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 20:31:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418D0106564A for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41058FC0A for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so10520645lbo.13 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:31:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/YRKt81DSUDz1C2PXsbZC90E31JIkOzulyNVarEQiDo=; b=qIuObfwdQ+AfIIprfhmWTFl12pRb3qDEBxXO8mLLkuxgV3B4cRKYy4FLAly8vJzeBT MLVBlI3PDgmQb1xM+0Wke2Pa+uA2iCY0Qle2uFVw5dkqkFu2bvwvmEr2/zOXo0csk7UX RintTKuLFyKl4/+VtYNISjZvbRorYpwNzZapB2DkyPLcTh4L7RrCMUtoQIHP4ChFrOhb PuZk6Xc9tp7Y3Wko8CEGzozCgNWPeqA0662h3SXd9Tg93bvlSoAX36gSKedypJ7dqY4b 7mTM9pXua+/TqcxDNhR/TpZyMaiWGeaAbwiywsmNLCRLycVQ+k4PTbi1p7cXYzPfizPA Cdrg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.44 with SMTP id gb12mr18531086lab.29.1343075477689; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.20.197 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:31:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:31:17 -0700 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Kim Culhan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multi vap Multi-SSID unique bssid eliminates client connect failures X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:31:19 -0000 On 23 July 2012 13:26, Kim Culhan wrote: >> Were the beacons going out correctly in both cases? And all that >> changed is the MAC address? > > The beacons appear to be going out correctly in either case and the > MAC addresses > are the only difference. Very cool. Ok, so the default behaviour isn't correctly allocating the different BSSIDs when creating VAPs. Would you please file a PR with all of the debugging/information you've gathered so far? I'd like to fix the default case to work correctly. Thanks again for tracking this down! Adrian