From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 6 12:27:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FA01065673 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+TY=9ad2eb9b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA7F8FC1B for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+TY=9ad2eb9b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75224D05AB for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:27:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:27:49 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080306122749.281768ba@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <1afdeaec0803052335v1c46ba2dof594c3a213c8913b@mail.gmail.com> References: <200803050036.33579.itz@mushinsky.net> <20080305171303.GA35180@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080305194611.A8684@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080306004221.14aa242c@gumby.homeunix.com.> <1afdeaec0803052335v1c46ba2dof594c3a213c8913b@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: amd64 or i386 for desktop use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:27:53 -0000 On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:35:34 +0000 "Colin Adams" wrote: > On 06/03/2008, RW wrote: > > > > Everything I've every seen about this suggests that amd64 is > > faster on a few applications, such as mp3 encoding, but generally > > there is very little difference, on average, across desktop > > applications. Do you have any measurements to support that 20% > > figure. > > I do on Linux (if that is relevant - I'm not clear if the question is > FreeBSD specific or not): > > See http://colina.demon.co.uk/?q=node/53 but your binary also grows to 5 times the size of the 32-bit version, it doesn't seem, in any sense, to be a typical desktop application.