Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:22:24 +0100 From: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSUP/To Gui or not to Gui [ Was Re: CVSUP Error: Shared object "libXaw.so.6" not found] Message-ID: <20020213152224.GA905@raggedclown.net> In-Reply-To: <20020213080628.GA84235@student.uu.se> References: <E2D6558ABE18D4119E720060084C966D0224642E@AURORA> <20020213070711.GA293@raggedclown.net> <20020212235441.E29413@blossom.cjclark.org> <20020213080628.GA84235@student.uu.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:06:29AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:54:41PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 08:07:11AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > > This change in the ports is really causing a lot of confusion. > > > Would it not be better to have "cvsup" as was, i.e. without GUI, > > > and have a "cvsup-with-gui" as the option. Many people do not run X11 > > > at all, so this would seem a more logical a way to go. > > > > > > I think it is called the principle of least surprise. > > > > cvsup(1) has always been the GUI version by default. > > Yes, but previously the package did not need to have X installed since > the necessary libraries were statically linked into the cvsup executable. > Ok, so I was wrong :) But the preceived effect is the same .. -- Regards Cliff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020213152224.GA905>