Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 09:44:39 +0200 From: Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@vfemail.net> Cc: "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r414781 - head/multimedia/ffmpeg Message-ID: <CAFU734x33gCbYXKOv1a0ypb8yZDCV12BWduD9=OkYS%2BV_dR_XA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <h9e9-bqso-wny@vfemail.net> References: <201605071810.u47IAEGx095469@repo.freebsd.org> <h9e9-bqso-wny@vfemail.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Jan, On 7 May 2016 at 21:40, Jan Beich <jbeich@vfemail.net> wrote: > Can you MFH all patch-level updates by default? Those contain stability > and security fixes much desired on quaterly branches. I'd be happy to do that, I was just not aware of this policy. For ffmpeg, I routinely double-check https://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html and noticed that 2.8.7 does not fix any known vulnerability. Since no build or runtime errors were reported in bugzilla for 2.8.6, it seemed to me that the quarterly branch does not have a problem that needs fixing. Is patch-level updating covered by a blanket? Best regards Riggs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFU734x33gCbYXKOv1a0ypb8yZDCV12BWduD9=OkYS%2BV_dR_XA>