From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 30 18:29:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF561065675 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008B98FC2C for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so394400ele.13 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:29:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=fWNOPA73s71LNGvlmQCFPqVNgpYmzXlZZVs4CvPRVOc=; b=uHFTjD5YQur+rXfcgQxDs8244d6AjVAn0l80xzzT0PRAqcxwy2RtQJGeGFeGATUTa8 KF0bTaayEq0t+FP08zG4E9bpfA7+f6doHQrTXrIaIudF9tyEKfd25ZPBoxfAHuAfPmA8 maN63o/vorbEgK2SMdDQz491TigfIx5zYSqVk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=XhYWEtTI0JDNQmuwOF3fp6bn/O1iveRIWLmHpY8Hymw+5sTh272Tqx2cA8sk48AxE1 7b0kj9IngOjAZ++6tHJL3pPiRtTm6wD3V/YA3FoY+X32OnE5p29/Wx86ygUyf5lqhOul yvlFJM/uZoQekpFcXUY15iQpFerbrZvDoUdyo= Received: by 10.142.240.9 with SMTP id n9mr4870205wfh.214.1225391396214; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.141.5 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b90810301129x58a6e5des56c062ecbb262663@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:29:55 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <539c60b90810301128j2493c4c1wc9519a6fef834490@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <539c60b90810301128j2493c4c1wc9519a6fef834490@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0efd276b056a3d11 Subject: Re: kqemu runs 2x faster on i386 than amd64!? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:29:58 -0000 Guess I should've mentioned the target is 32-bit win2k... On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Steve Franks wrote: > I'm not comparing apples-to-apples exactly, but both my disks are in > the same system, both are running 7-stable from within the last few > months, so it's pretty close. Also, the i386 is a direct replacement > of the amd64 to fix this and other problems, so the software & > settings set is pretty identical also... > > kqemu crawls when I boot amd64 (and I notice the processor is always > over 50%), and it's reasonalbly usable on i386 (also, the processor is > often in the 30% range, instead of 60%). > > Steve >