Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:22:38 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /var/db/ports/*/options auto-generation Message-ID: <469C27EE.1070401@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070717015620.S82541@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20070715201435.Y39602@woozle.rinet.ru> <469B0894.9050408@FreeBSD.org> <20070716183849.S73148@woozle.rinet.ru> <1184612752.82441.19.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20070717015620.S82541@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>
> PL> > It's not exactly what I want as I need to repeat Tab-Enter pairs for each of
> PL> > OPTIONS contained port. What I want is generation options file for all the
> PL> > ports including defaults (possibly overrided in /etc/make.conf) WITH/WITHOUT
> PL> > lines...
> PL>
> PL> Ok, so what about make -V OPTIONS in the port directory, and some
> PL> creative awkery on the output?
>
> It's definitely possible, but it constructs single line of output which is
> rather hard to parse (though possible, surely).
>
'for i in {WITH/WITHOUT file}' or read(1) solves that little problem.
The only catch is that there's a bit of added overhead, but I doubt it's
much..
> What about creating special target such as 'create-options-file' or
> 'update-options-file' acting depending of existance of /var/db/ports/*/options
> and then acting accordingly?
>
That might be a good idea, as I think it'd allow more tools to benefit
from the added functionality.
> Well, after a little bit of thought I suppose it should be presented to
> ports-mgr@ to decide...
>
>
> Sincerely,
> D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
>
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?469C27EE.1070401>