Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:01:01 +0100 From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, petefrench@ticketswitch.com, to.my.trociny@gmail.com Subject: Re: hast vs ggate+gmirror sychrnoisation speed Message-ID: <E1PAlxN-000H5x-Eh@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> In-Reply-To: <E1PAlTI-000Gtb-Lz@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Actually, I just llooked I dmesg on the secondary - it is full of messages thus: Oct 26 15:44:59 serpentine-passive hastd[10394]: [serp0] (secondary) Unable to receive request header: RPC version wrong. Oct 26 15:45:00 serpentine-passive hastd[782]: [serp0] (secondary) Worker process exited ungracefully (pid=10394, exitcode=75). Oct 26 15:46:59 serpentine-passive hastd[10421]: [serp0] (secondary) Unable to receive request header: RPC version wrong. Oct 26 15:47:04 serpentine-passive hastd[782]: [serp0] (secondary) Worker process exited ungracefully (pid=10421, exitcode=75). Does that help explain my issues ? I have the same OS build running on both machines, so I dont see how I can have a version mismatch. The ethernet here cnsists of a pair of bge devices, which are bundled using LACP and lagg. I didnt see this on my test setup, but that was using ethernet directly - could there be a difference there ? -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1PAlxN-000H5x-Eh>