From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 15:06:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA45F106564A for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org) Received: from mail.acquirer.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1bb8:2004:150::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AED48FC14 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:06:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Envelope-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from cupcake.internal.acquirer.com (cupcake.internal.acquirer.com [10.228.100.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.acquirer.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBDF5tuF039428 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:05:55 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org) Message-ID: <4D063652.10105@foobar.org> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:05:54 +0000 From: Nick Hilliard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.3a2pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Venturoli References: <4D0615F9.6090400@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4D0615F9.6090400@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on muffin.acquirer.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FlySpray and Postgres X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:06:03 -0000 On 13/12/2010 12:47, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Since I'd like to use Flyspray and Postgres, I'm looking into some insight > on this: is this only a limitation of the port? yup. I was just too lazy to look at supporting it. If you want to submit some patches, that would be good. Nick