Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 22:08:31 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: peter@jhome.dialix.com (Peter Wemm), nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/find function.c Message-ID: <199509130408.WAA08549@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199509130120.SAA04683@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950913073448.513B-100000@jhome.DIALix.COM> <199509130120.SAA04683@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Direct CVS repository munging ] > > > Whip me, beat me, call me bad names, but don't take away my CVS > > > privileges. :) > > Per mail to this list these types of actions can lead to, and well > if they cause the repository manager heartache, loss of commit privlidge. Of course, but if a person knows what they are doing (or at least if they can fake it) it avoids the heartache and grief. > I will also presume that he knows that I can now find his commit in > the commitlogs but can not find it in the RCS files :-(. Yes, but it's *very* obvious what happened, since the next commit message in the log is the fix which was mentioned in the previous (no longer necessary) commitlog messages. > Along with the fact some one could have supped 1.5, burned it on a > cdrom and now what is 1.5 is a different file :-(. If someone was silly enough to burn a CD-ROM of the tree in it's current state, *AND* if they could get the sup to happen after my two original commits but before the third, they deserved to get burned. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509130408.WAA08549>