Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 May 2021 08:12:32 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net>
Cc:        User questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Updating /usr/ports
Message-ID:  <445yz383bj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210528064525.000029cf@seibercom.net> (jerry@seibercom.net's message of "Fri, 28 May 2021 06:45:25 -0400")
References:  <20210524124023.6372a3383876a1196cf81705@3dresearch.com> <CAN6yY1tjCCiSahAaVAnH2HAWuZCAw29ZEPrP2LerhEuFaK=8xw@mail.gmail.com> <20210526001153.e668d925df825e3486c5f7b9@3dresearch.com> <CAN6yY1sXbiogdGo2_1Nc4Cfoi61CR-M6zUTFsTpz8_SWj1_w_w@mail.gmail.com> <20210528064525.000029cf@seibercom.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> writes:

> On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:01:52 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated:
>>If you are trying to replace portsnap, I think the answer is net/gitup.
>>This only requires a single command,  "gitup ports", and you get your
>>index updated along with updating all ports. I believe that the plan
>>is to put gitup into the base system fairly soon. I have not looked at
>>whether 14-current has gitup, yet.
>>
>>And, yes, it looks like the handbook needs some work as gitup is not
>>yet even mentioned. Like portsnap, gitup is for people who want to
>>maintain an up to date ports tree, but not good for developers. They
>>do need to use git and either generate the index or fetch it.
>
> If "gitup" can fetch the "index" file, why can "git" not also
> accomplish that feat? Is it a technical reason?

The index file isn't in the repository.

Not sure if you'd call that a "technical" reason, but "gitup" has a
number of bits of FreeBSD-specific knowledge.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?445yz383bj.fsf>