From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed May 4 15:46:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34941B2DD84; Wed, 4 May 2016 15:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3D21DC2; Wed, 4 May 2016 15:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 28BC019EA; Wed, 4 May 2016 15:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:46:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Matthew Seaman Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r414422 - in head/www: . squid-devel squid-devel/files Message-ID: <20160504154649.GA95855@FreeBSD.org> References: <201605012027.u41KRuxf091388@repo.freebsd.org> <20160503030337.GE52316@FreeBSD.org> <33a7ed1b-d4f6-fb96-f8bb-be92f6fa3139@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <33a7ed1b-d4f6-fb96-f8bb-be92f6fa3139@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 15:46:49 -0000 On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/03/16 04:03, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 08:27:56PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> New Revision: 414422 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/414422 > >> > >> Log: > >> Squid is a fully-featured HTTP/1.0 proxy [...] > >> WWW: http://www.squid-cache.org/ > >> > >> PR: 203860 > >> Submitted by: timp87@gmail.com > >> > >> Added: > >> head/www/squid-devel/ > > > > Shouldn't it be repocopied rather than added as a new port? > > Now you come to mention it, that does sound like a good idea. I'll do a > delete+copy+patch thing later so that port can have some history. Thank you, that'd be appreciated. ./danfe