Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 15:13:47 -0800 (PST) From: Snob Art Genre <ben@narcissus.ml.org> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970302151232.6784A-100000@narcissus.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <199703022154.NAA06808@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > >From The Desk Of Charles Henrich : > > >> Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and get h > im > > >> the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8) > > > > > > If you check the stats page, you'll notice he just changed his listing > > > from 606k keys/sec to 676k keys/sec, so he has the updated binary. The > > > wonders of mime attachments :-) > > > > I see how you are Amancio! Did you single user a nice -20 to get 396? :) > > > > Nope, I took out a few transistor that I didn't need on my PPRO 8) > > No, I just recompile the binary without -m486 and added -finline-functions. I wonder how set RSA is on not releasing source for the next version of the client -- I'm tempted to see if I can increase my score by recompiling, but it seems pointless if this client is about to be deprecated. > Cheers, > Amancio > > > Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.970302151232.6784A-100000>