Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1995 14:42:24 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: me@freebsd.org (Michael Elbel) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xemacs Message-ID: <199510041342.OAA15226@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Oct 1995 12:08:50 %2B0200." <m0t0Qks-000Pa8C@tartufo.pcs.dec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: me@tartufo.pcs.dec.com (Michael Elbel) > ... > I don't think it makes sense to > force the presence of a package that is only used in certain circumstances. > On the other hand, it *should* be noted somewhere conveniently that > you need netpbm to use w3 under xemacs. > ... I think Satoshi was going to invent a new variable name for things to suggest the port user might also want to install. ( This came about while discussing EXEC_DEPENDS, & how it wasn't appropriate for ghostview within hylafax, (as there were many other ways to use the hylafax .ps files), & yet one might want to suggest the user consider installing ghostview. ) Julian S
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510041342.OAA15226>