Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Jun 1996 13:32:32 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Cc:        nate@sri.MT.net, stable@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org, scanner@webspan.net
Subject:   Re: Status of -stable 
Message-ID:  <17488.834093152@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jun 1996 08:36:10 PDT." <199606061536.IAA00209@austin.polstra.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Well, I liked -stable too!  Are you sure you're not over-reacting to
> the recent nightmare?  That pesky post-traumatic stress syndrome thing?
> Hey, in time, the night sweats and flashbacks will pass. :-)

:-)

No, it's been a matter of concern for some time, actually.  David and
I have been talking about -stable in hushed tones of "What the f***
are we going to do about this wart long-term?  We can't keep doing
this!" for at least a year.  This may have been the last straw, but it
was hardly the only (or even most significant) one.  It's an ongoing
maintainance headache and we really don't have the resources to do
this, it's just that simple.

Either we make the process simpler (ditch CVS) or we get a lot more
people to work on FreeBSD and do it by brute force (yuck), but we
can't keep doing it with what we've got now.

					Jordan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17488.834093152>