From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 12 18:35:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734171065679 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5.netcologne.de (smtp5.netcologne.de [194.8.194.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A4D8FC1D for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llea.celt.neu (xdsl-89-0-135-84.netcologne.de [89.0.135.84]) by smtp5.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B637B40D176; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:35:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CDD8907.3060405@laposte.net> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:35:51 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=FCnewald?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100630 SeaMonkey/2.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Farmer References: <201011100009.oAA09mfG024502@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20101112011934.GC35128@guilt.hydra> <20101112071646.GF37058@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tips for installing windows and freeBSD both.. anyone?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:35:53 -0000 Hello Rob, Rob Farmer wrote: > Most general computer users will never give up the GUI, because it > involves investing in computer skills and they don't see that as > terribly worthwhile - they just want to get started on their work. I > think some UNIX fans are reluctant to accept this, and in doing so > limit its ability to grow. That's my reason for preferring GUI in most > situations. I share your observation of user behaviour, and it is probably appropriate: although there is many _funny_ways to use computers, most of us just want to have some work done and GUI sometimes provide a quick way to put our hands on it. But in my opinion, a complete GUI software should also provide some command line facilities. I mean, for instance, a word processing software could be shipped with command line tools that could be used to * inspect document properties (word count, meta information fields); * convert the document to a publishable form such as PostScript; * do field replacement for mailings; and many less elementary treatments could also be useful! Some software comes with a scripting language, but for simple operation and batch processing, this may not be so convenient as a command line tool. This kind of functionnalities could be a bridge from the GUI to the command line for some users: I feel these worlds are so separated, while they do not have to. I sometimes feel that this separation is precisely the wall that keep many computer users to develop their computer skill, despite they use one all day long. This ``computer illiteracy'' is very dommageable, not only because it makes it hard for the average user to learn from more experienced users, but also because it let software editors be economically successful while selling incomplete, crippled, software. -- Best regards, Michael