From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 13:00:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151191065676; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AA08FC1E; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB4D09dq053692; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:00:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mB4D09SN053689; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:00:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:00:09 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081204135941.C53671@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20081204113806.GA4578@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tool for benchmark local disk vs. iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:00:17 -0000 >> >> My first thought was about "iozone"... > > iozone is ok, but a little complex to run. Any disk benchmark will be ok > - bonnie++, blogbench, etc. but each has an emphasis on a different > aspect of the system. I think bonnie++ will be the simplest in your case. can bonnie++ operate on raw device not filesystem? he asked about disk benchmarked not disk+filesystem > > Make sure you know what you're benchmarking - for example if the iSCSI > drive (target) is hosted as a file in a regular file system, it will be > overly (and dangerously) cached on the server. > >